Services

Authorized Engagements Only

Every activity described here is performed only against systems whose owner has authorized the work in writing. Scope, timing, contacts and rules of engagement are agreed before anything starts, and where infrastructure is hosted by a third party, their rules apply as well. Any provider willing to skip that step is telling you something about how they work.

Which Engagement Answers Your Question?

The services above answer different questions, and buying the wrong one is a common and expensive mistake.

• Am I patched? That is scanning, and it belongs in continuous hygiene rather than in a project.
• Can someone get in? That is penetration testing, and it is wasted effort if the scanner-visible issues are still outstanding when the tester arrives.
• Is our control network exposed? That is an OT and ICS assessment, a different discipline with different safety constraints.
• Would we know? That is monitoring and detection, and it is only worth building against a response plan.
• Can we prove it to a customer or an assessor? That is compliance readiness.

What a Useful Report Contains

Reproduction steps, evidence, business impact and prioritized remediation a developer could pick up as a work item. A severity-sorted tool export is not a report. Confirm before signing whether remediation verification is included and how long you have to use it, because a report is not a fix.

No assessment can establish that a system is secure. What it can establish is what was tested, how, and what was found, which is a narrower and far more useful claim.

Where We Will Tell You Not to Buy

If the basics are outstanding, a test will mostly rediscover them at a higher price. Multi-factor authentication on remote access, patching that actually runs, backups that have been restored at least once, and logging that reaches somewhere a person looks are worth more than a first penetration test on most estates. Sequencing matters more than spend, and we would rather say so during scoping.